An immigrant group, coming from a high risk country into Israel, where the risk was through sexual transmission, was also tested. In both waves of immigration additional HIV antibody positive infected individuals were detected. In the first wave of 285 tested, 8 of the 15 infections were in the WP, while in the second wave of the 537 tested, 2 of the 28 infections were in the WP. The difference between the two populations was that the first population had been exposed to high prevalence and high risk of HIV only for one year, which explains the lower prevalence and the higher number of the infections being recent ones, with many still in the seronegative WP. The second population was exposed to HIV for several years, leading to a higher prevalence but a lower number of new infections which were missed by current serology.
In Russia, 25 discordant couples were tested using the SMARTube. Five were seropositive on both plasma and SMARTplasma, however there was an infected person who tested positive only when using SMARTplasma. Viral load was 900,000, i.e. that person was not only HIV infected and still in the WP, but also very infectious, and missed by current serology. When the SMARTube was incorporated into routine laboratory use, within the first 300 samples tested, the confirmed diagnosis of one patient was achieved, using SMARTube, 4-6 weeks prior to complete seroconversion Confidential 20 in plasma. In South Africa, in a high prevalence and incidence area, a cross sectional comparative study showed full concordance between the confirmed antibody positive results in plasma and in SMARTplasma. In a prospective study, several hundred individuals were followed, monthly for up to 9 months, to measure the rate of new infections by seroconversions. In several individuals, antibodies were detected in SMARTplasma 1-4 months prior to plasma seroconversion. It is important to note, that while the incubation of the blood in the SMARTube increases the levels of the HIV specific antibodies in infected individuals, it does not adversely affect the diagnostic specificity. On the contrary, the SMARTube has been found to decrease the false positive rate on the routinely used diagnostic kits, thus increasing the specificity of the kit in the tested population. There are several mechanisms which contribute to this phenomena, one of them being that while increasing the specific signal (HIV antibodies) the plasma itself is diluted 1:5 (1ml of blood, i.e. ~0.5ml plasma, put into 2ml of SMART solution), thus decreasing "noise" and leading to a decrease of as high as 100% in the false positive rate. In addition, the use of the SMARTube enables the laboratory to get, and provide, a more confirmed negative result. Currently, using plasma, those who were seronegative, yet in the WP, (i.e. actually infected) are falsely recorded as negative. One cannot differentiate between those who are truly HIV negative and those who are HIV infected yet still in the WP – they all give the same 'negative reading' on the assays used. When using the SMARTube, the WP samples test positive, thus making the antibody negative results confirmed negative.